10 Bands We Want To See Make a Comeback(Article) Options

[Pokey]

That just means the uploader didn't read his ticket stub.

How the hell can you just say that with such certainty? God youre insane.

[SJN1279]

How the hell can you just say that with such certainty? God youre insane.

I meant his stub would say Ed Kowalczyk of LIVE. LIVE 2.0 will most likely say LIVE. With Ed, at least you know you aren't getting LIVE, just a member of the band,

[OutToDry]

So if I respond the same way if it happens with new Live then that reason/excuse is valid, correct? They didn't pay enough attention? Right?

And how do you know he didn't read it? Maybe he did and since Ed is still trying to be Live that the uploader just thought it was Live?

Poster mentions Live. Stub mentions Live. Ed is singing Live songs. Who is being deceptive again?

Ed's allowed to sings the songs he helped birth. No issue. But the whole of Live,Live's billing is the deception.

[OutToDry]

I meant his stub would say Ed Kowalczyk of LIVE. LIVE 2.0 will most likely say LIVE. With Ed, at least you know you aren't getting LIVE, just a member of the band,

Live is an incorporated company. Someone is no longer in that company,legally in the articles of corporation. They cannot bill them selves as that company in the present tense. We havea thread for this,,,,,, you got owned there, but were we go again in this thead.

[rock4adiference]

His little cha-cha dance moves and the 4 people in the audience is laughable. I wonder if they got a free bowl of soup with the purchase of a ticket.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jghu7wnMqOk

Wow that was horrible!! The sound clip Live posted on their FB of the same song was 100 times better than that!

[Pokey]

I meant his stub would say Ed Kowalczyk of LIVE. LIVE 2.0 will most likely say LIVE. With Ed, at least you know you aren't getting LIVE, just a member of the band,

But Nick they ARE getting Live. What part of that don't you understand? They are getting a different version of Live to what we have seen in the past, but that IS now Live, you don't have to like it, but that's the way it is.

You must think people are absolute morons to go to a concert but not really know who they're going to see. But for god sake the singer, album or tour hasn't been announced yet and you're jumping up and down about what's happening. None of what you are saying is happening. Wait until there is an announcement and an album and a tour that is happening and if people are still having meltdowns because they went and expected Ed and didn't get him, then complain. But until then you're just making a big deal out of one POSSIBLE scenario and treating it like it's something that happened last night.

Why don't you just let Live do it's thing and follow Ed and be happy? Why do you keep hanging on to what now to you is essentially just a name. The substance and the spirit and the sound that you love is still happening elsewhere. You don't see Ed complaining about these things, so if he doesn't care, why should you?

[aLIVEinNORWAY]

Personally, Live is my number 1 band that I would like to see make a comeback.

[PillarOfDavidson]

I meant his stub would say Ed Kowalczyk of LIVE. LIVE 2.0 will most likely say LIVE. With Ed, at least you know you aren't getting LIVE, just a member of the band,

Only.... he's not a member of the band anymore. He hasn't been in over two years.

Btw, the "10 bands we blah blah" link this thread is about? Buhsheeit.