Ed's Bootlegs (inc. Supreme Court summons), not so legal after all? Options

[Bremang]

I have the amended complaint, its a pdf, will upload later tonight or early tomorrow.

[Bremang]

I hope when we do get one it gets its own thread.

maybe i'll read it first, if theres a huge difference i'll make a new thread.

[OutToDry]

Give us the link to download it ourselves. It's not listed on the main page the original one is. Where did you find it?

[VoodooLady]

Give us the link to download it ourselves. It's not listed on the main page the original one is. Where did you find it?

i cant find it either..

[Bremang]

http://www.mediafire.com/?iimmi30zozn

Here is the amended complaint. I didn't really have time to read through it yet, so I couldn't see too much of a difference. I did see where it says Amended Complaint or something like that. I got it by emailing scroll.

This post has been edited by Bremang: Jun 30 2010, 4:38 pm

[OutToDry]

I think the ammendment was David Levin's company title

David Levin Business
Management, Inc

to

David Levin CPA, P.C.

[Bremang]

I think the ammendment was David Levin's company title

David Levin Business
Management, Inc

to

David Levin CPA, P.C.

I guess so I just read it through now, and I don't see much difference. Though the attorney signed this on the 18th, so that is one day after the 30 day time limit.. I wonder if that means Ed/Levin did not respond. If the amendment is the updated Levin name, then I wish the attorney got it right the first time, we might have to wait another 30 days. Also I didn't realize before that it says that CCP are looking for at least 2.6 mil for this. Looking forward to a response.

This post has been edited by Bremang: Jun 30 2010, 5:14 pm

[Sakhmet2]

maybe i'll read it first, if theres a huge difference i'll make a new thread.

Make a new thread anyway pls. This one's too long.

[Bremang]

Make a new thread anyway pls. This one's too long.

haha sry. There wasn't too much difference so I figured we wouldn't go on about it. If Ed responds though, a new thread might make it easier to keep track

[Aitkens]

Ed can't respond because he doesn't know what they're talking about, he's just so busy focusing on his new album and his tour.

[Bremang]

Ed can't respond because he doesn't know what they're talking about, he's just so busy focusing on his new album and his tour.

Maybe Levin will respond

[OutToDry]

I bet the thing got extended as they made an ammedment to the legal doc (so another 30 days from the 18th)

[Wambangalang]

they could make ammendments till the cows come home regarding ed, i mean eddie k, i mean edward, i mean...

[Existentialist]

Either way, the fact remains that Ed did not meet his contractual obligations and even acknowledged this by paying them something even though it was a fraction of what they deserved. He clearly is at fault and stinks of rancid shit worse than meconium. By the time the courts are through with him, I'm sure he'll have to sell his house and will be playing the children's stage at large concerts. Oh wait....

[jaybb]

I guess so I just read it through now, and I don't see much difference. Though the attorney signed this on the 18th, so that is one day after the 30 day time limit.. I wonder if that means Ed/Levin did not respond. If the amendment is the updated Levin name, then I wish the attorney got it right the first time, we might have to wait another 30 days. Also I didn't realize before that it says that CCP are looking for at least 2.6 mil for this. Looking forward to a response.

The clock on the 30 day time limit starts after they have been served. So let's say the suit is filed on the 10th of the month, but a process server doesn't actually hand them the papers until the 30th for whatever reason (they can't locate him, etc), the 30 days don't start until the 30th. If they are unable to serve in person, most states allow for "substituted service," with the courts permission, meaning the papers can be either mailed via certified mail and must be signed for by the parties named or they can be handed to somebody at the person's regular residence or place of business.