Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> Acoustic, would it have been better?
+Ed+
post Sep 8 2010, 1:41 am
Post #1



Gaz Ed

Group Icon

Reputation: 1092.5 Rep Power: 1092.5
+Ed+ is off the scale  ()
Group: Members
Posts: 5,056
Joined: Feb 2006








Ok, here's the deal. My ill mind seeks for another way to forgive and virtually like Ed once again. It is subconcious, I am betting.

But for now it is losing.

After watching this: http://www.fansoflive.com/forums/index.php...t=0&#entry74198

I thought.... would it have been better if Ed did not get his "band" together and have an acoustic carreer. Singing same old songs, ok, some - with strings etc etc... but without any "band"

Would it be easier for us to digest?

This post has been edited by +Ed+: Sep 8 2010, 1:41 am


User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
Nobody Knows
post Sep 9 2010, 8:44 am
Post #2



FansOfLive Senior

*****

Reputation: 117 Rep Power: 117
Nobody Knows is off the scale  ()
Group: Members
Posts: 463
Joined: Feb 2006
From: Far Away








To be honest I really don't care, but the instrumental work on the CD sound so fucking bland... it's truly horrible. So, yeah, because that's the case I would have preferred an acoustic sound.

This post has been edited by Nobody Knows: Sep 9 2010, 8:45 am


User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post



Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 users are reading this topic (2 guests and 0 anonymous users)
0 members:

 


Lo-Fi Version Current date & time: August 27th, 2026 - 12:50 pm