If SFBM was Live's First Album, how would it be received? Options

[edstipe]

One thing I have noticed about the reviews that have been posted for SFBM (and not only there, but by members of this board giving their opinions as well), is that many of the reviewers noted what Live used to sound like, and have based part of their judgement of SFBM on their perspective of the band's new sound as opposed to their old sound.

This begs the question, how would SFBM be perceived if it were Live's first album rather than their seventh, thereby giving no opportunity to be judged based on previous notions of the band?

Would it be laughed off as a futile attempt at a band to mimic the sound of U2 and similar established groups? Would it be embraced as a record that shows the potential for a band with serious pop-rock hooks and melodies? Or would it fall somewhere in between?

Any thoughts?

[Costakoui]

That’s a very good question . Possibly it would fall somewhere in between but I don’t think that it would receive such bad reviews. Comparing is very often problematic because it sets definitions and boundaries and thus produces narrowed evaluations. To me, there is no Live sound and no Live roots to compare with; it is only Live songs which I either like or not. I liked some songs from V, BoP and now SFBM and I carry on with listening to a solid and very underrated band.