When will Live get back together?, blablabla Options

[+Ed+]

Ok, we have not had this stupid thread before, but... after reading stuff about Alter Bridge and Creed and etc etc I thought that really re-union is nearly inevitable...

So.. vote away... Let us see what the fols think.

[OutToDry]

When Chad, Chad and Pat take a TGF hiatus and get another singer to front Live, will you organize the NJ National Guard against them.

[sh4rpz]

I think we will see LIVE again - but without Ed Kowalczyk.

[AgentK7]

I think we will see LIVE again - but without Ed Kowalczyk.

I think that Chad, Chad and Pat are classier then that. Being that Ed was the very distinctive lead vocalist and "face" of the band, it wouldn't be right to go out and tour without him under the name LIVE.

I'm listening to Gracious Few's stuff and it really reminds me of the harder rocking Throwing Copper era days.... If Ed could wake up out of the trance he's been in the last 10 years and write some lyrics and sing with that intensity LIVE could really kick some ass again....

This post has been edited by AgentK7: Jun 10 2010, 6:41 pm

[Aitkens]

I think that Chad, Chad and Pat are classier then that. Being that Ed was the very distinctive lead vocalist and "face" of the band, it wouldn't be right to go out and tour without him under the name LIVE.

If Alice In Chains can pull it off without Layne, I think that Live could be able to pull it off as well.

[AgentK7]

If Alice In Chains can pull it off without Layne, I think that Live could be able to pull it off as well.

I think the circumstances for that band are very different, if Layne Staley was still in the land of the living do you think they would have reunited without him under their old name?

Even so, as a cohesive unit that band wasn't really together for much more than 10 years. Also, on their last original material album another member of the band was lead vocalist on three of the four singles. Not being a big Alice In Chains fan myself do any fans on this board think reuniting was worth it or just a cash grab?

I was thinking about this further and usually when bands continue without their founding/principal lead vocalists it's often for tragic reasons...as in they died. INXS, AC/DC, Queen, the Doors are ones I can think of off the top of my head. In the long term history shows only AC/DC really pulled it off.......

[Bremang]

I think the circumstances for that band are very different, if Layne Staley was still in the land of the living do you think they would have reunited without him under their old name?

Even so, as a cohesive unit that band wasn't really together for much more than 10 years. Also, on their last original material album another member of the band was lead vocalist on three of the four singles. Not being a big Alice In Chains fan myself do any fans on this board think reuniting was worth it or just a cash grab?

I was thinking about this further and usually when bands continue without their founding/principal lead vocalists it's often for tragic reasons...as in they died. INXS, AC/DC, Queen, the Doors are ones I can think of off the top of my head. In the long term history shows only AC/DC really pulled it off.......

Who made who baby, who made who

how about Van Halen?

[AgentK7]

Who made who baby, who made who

how about Van Halen?

Close but no cigar, Ed was in the band twice as long as either Roth or Hagar were in Van Halen....

[Bremang]

Close but no cigar, Ed was in the band twice as long as either Roth or Hagar were in Van Halen....

Bon only had 6 years in ACDC

David was in Van Halen for 15 years

[Sakhmet2]

Bon only had 6 years in ACDC

David was in Van Halen for 15 years

Morrison was only in The Doors for about 6 years.

[Bremang]

Morrison was only in The Doors for about 6 years.

yea he wasn't saying that the doors pulled it off though.