Really ? Options

[Hoodstock]

My wife was complaining and asking why I still check that Live website when they're not even a band and I was telling her that there's actually a lot going on since there are actually going to be 2 albums released this year by Ed and TGF. Eventually the conversation got to:

"Really - you're going to support the guy who was a jerk and asked his friends for a lead singers fee, stabbed his group in the back, and wrecked your favorite band?"

Good Point - With all the exciting news sometimes you lose perspective on how it all started.

This post has been edited by Hoodstock: Apr 7 2010, 1:20 pm

[SJN1279]

My wife was complaining and asking why I still check that Live website when they're not even a band and I was telling her that there's actually a lot going on since there are actually going to be 2 albums released this year by Ed and TGF. Eventually the conversation got to:

"Really - you're going to support the guy asked his friends for a lead singers fee, stabbed his group in the back, and wrecked your favorite band?"

Good Point - With all the exciting news sometimes you lose perspective on how it all started.

You are taking one side of the story as gospel. Online behavior shows that The Gracious Few have been less than "gracious" in a number of circumstances. I think there was fault on both sides of the fence when it comes to Live's demise.

Over-touring didn't help either.

[thefunkyredcaboose]

You are taking one side of the story as gospel. Online behavior shows that The Gracious Few have been less than "gracious" in a number of circumstances. I think there was fault on both sides of the fence when it comes to Live's demise.

Over-touring didn't help either.

TGF being "less than gracious" toward Ed actually supports the story they provided.

Is there another side of the story? Of course there is. Has Ed bothered to reveal any of it? Nope. Until then, it is fine to take Chad's notes as "gospel" because he provided a great deal of plausible detail and in any legal battle it would be less than smart to make up details like that.

You don't have to believe Chad, but it's more than okay to do so because he is the only one to provide any tangible information.

[Sakhmet2]

TGF being "less than gracious" toward Ed actually supports the story they provided.

Um no. It proves nothing either way.

Is there another side of the story? Of course there is. Has Ed bothered to reveal any of it? Nope. Until then, it is fine to take Chad's notes as "gospel" because he provided a great deal of plausible detail and in any legal battle it would be less than smart to make up details like that.

And wouldn't even less smart for Ed to comment?

You don't have to believe Chad, but it's more than okay to do so because he is the only one to provide any tangible information.

Actually he hasn't. He's made a bunch of allegations but allegations are just words. When he products actual documents *that's* tangible proof.

This post has been edited by Sakhmet2: Apr 7 2010, 2:41 pm

[thefunkyredcaboose]

Um no. It proves nothing either way.

I didn't say it "proved" anything, I just said that it matched up with the explanation they provided.

It wouldn't be smart for Ed to say anything either way, but he has given no explanation for the band break-up. The only explanation out there is the one provided by TGF. If that sits well with you, fine, but his lack of acknowledgment bothers me.

In modern day internet culture, an artist getting into discussions (and sometimes arguments) with fans (and non-fans) is actually pretty common. Being up front with fans (and non-fans) is the way of the business now.

[SinfulEyes]

I think it's pretty safe to say Ed has already lost most if not all of his fans.

TGF will easily outdo Ed and his silly solo act.