Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> static set lists, if only Live were more flexible
phungi
post Aug 19 2009, 1:27 pm
Post #1



FansOfLive Freshman

**

Reputation: 18 Rep Power: 18
phungi is off the scale  ()
Group: Members
Posts: 28
Joined: Apr 2006








Not to get into a Live vs Pearl Jam (or Live vs another band) argument, but someone posted the following on a Pearl Jam forum about the current tour:

QUOTE
These 6 shows have been incredible so far!!!! Sick setlists all the way through.

I did some tabulating... and through the 6 shows thus far they've played 79...

yes... 79... different songs...

79 songs over 6 concerts consecutively is pretty amazing.

Given Live's discography (7 studio albums, numerous covers) they could certainly mix it up a bit more. I pulled 6 set lists from the "On the Road" threads, and calculated 25 different songs over 6 shows (alphabetically, with # of times played)
QUOTE

All Over You (6)
Believe (2)
Blowin' In the Wind (2)
Dance with you (1)
Dolphins Cry (6)
Forever (6)
Gas Head (6)
Heaven (6)
Hold Me Up (6)
I Alone (6)
Iris (1)
Lakinis Juice (6)
Lightning Crashes (6)
Purifier (2)
Run to the Water (2)
Selling the Drama (2)
Shit Towne (2)
Sofia (6)
Supernatural (1)
The Distance (5)
They Stood up for Love (2)
Top (2)
Turn My Head (6)
Waitress (1)
White Discussion (6)


I may be off by a count or two, but these are the only songs played over 6 nights... not a very diverse set list, considering they have a catalog of 88 studio songs as well as 10+ covers. As much as I will miss them if they do not reunite after this hiatus, I already miss them not being the premier touring band that lives up to the name +Live+.

Just my opinion, of course...


User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
SJN1279
post Aug 19 2009, 1:45 pm
Post #2



Lakini

Group Icon

Reputation: 1908.5 Rep Power: 1908.5
SJN1279 is off the scale  ()
Group: Members
Posts: 7,863
Joined: Feb 2006
From: NJ








QUOTE(phungi @ Aug 19 2009, 2:27 pm) *

Not to get into a Live vs Pearl Jam (or Live vs another band) argument, but someone posted the following on a Pearl Jam forum about the current tour:
Given Live's discography (7 studio albums, numerous covers) they could certainly mix it up a bit more. I pulled 6 set lists from the "On the Road" threads, and calculated 25 different songs over 6 shows (alphabetically, with # of times played)

I may be off by a count or two, but these are the only songs played over 6 nights... not a very diverse set list, considering they have a catalog of 88 studio songs as well as 10+ covers. As much as I will miss them if they do not reunite after this hiatus, I already miss them not being the premier touring band that lives up to the name +Live+.

Just my opinion, of course...


This thread isn't relevant as we won't be seeing Live touring again for quite some time, if at all ever again. We might as well talk about how the Beatles should mix up their setlist at a future show(not that is anywhere near that level of popculture).


User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post



Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 users are reading this topic (1 guests and 0 anonymous users)
0 members:

 


Lo-Fi Version Current date & time: July 12th, 2026 - 12:45 am