Where do you think Live should film their rumored DVD? Options

[SJN1279]

I chose Holland because I feel the band could get a large and intense crowd out for the filming. I would even consider making the trip if it is filmed at an appropriate time. While the US would be more convenient for me, in my mind, Holland makes the most sense.

[Gagball]

I think they should film it in 1995.

[SJN1279]

I think they should film it in 1995.

So that we could see Ed stand in one place and sing with his eyes closed for under 90 minutes. No thanks!

[SecretInsomnia]

So that we could see Ed stand in one place and sing with his eyes closed for under 90 minutes. No thanks!

Musically Gagball is right. The expressions, the raw enery and the passionate performing could have been filmed better a 10 years ago than now.

For the show, I think Nick is right: Ed is much more interacting with the audience, Chad's stomps weren't that great 10 years ago and it's more of a show than in 1995. And after all, that's what a dvd is about, else wise they could just put out a live CD

personally I wouldn't go for any of both suggestions, I would liked them to film in 2000. They were still a lill good 'alternative' on stage round that era, but still it were also huge shows, remember pinkpop 2000, rock am ring, werchter. Great audiences!