Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> Wow, Live's newer albums sound like crap...., NOT WHAT YOU THINK
mattdm11
post May 13 2007, 11:13 pm
Post #1



FansOfLive Junior

****

Reputation: 263 Rep Power: 263
mattdm11 is off the scale  ()
Group: Members
Posts: 192
Joined: Feb 2006








this has nothing to do with bashing the band, per se....but with the state of cd mastering. submitted for your listening pleasure - two +live+ songs - mirror song, from mental jewelry, and simple creed, from V. i have done nothing to the tracks, except "equalize" them using mp3gain. mirror song was mastered at a decibel level of 92.4, and has minimal clipping (the effect of making the CD "louder", ruining the dynamic range in the process). simple creed was mastered at a staggering 99.9 dB. both have been reduced to a decibel level of 91.5 (technically, the way mp3gain works, mirror song is now 90.9 dB and simple creed is 90.8 - negligible difference). even though there is some clipping on mirror song, listen to how crisp everything sounds compared to the sludge that is simple creed. (as an FYI, simple creed is not even the "loudest" song on V - some tracks are over 100 dB.)

http://download.yousendit.com/A63C51C953CAAA7F (mirror song)

http://download.yousendit.com/8B5162D660812117 (simple creed)

its about time that fans start complaining about the way all these new cds are being mastered....hell, its driving me to vinyl its become so bad. its amazing that CDs recorded 15-20 years ago sound better than what comes out now....all for the sake of the loudness war. take a look at this 2 minute clip:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Gmex_4hreQ


i stumbled upon this a few months ago, and to be honest, it has somewhat ruined my music listening. its so noticeable now...EVERY new CD is like this. ever wonder why californication sounded so bad? almost every song is over 100 dB - i think one song reaches 102 dB.

im curious as to what you all think.

This post has been edited by mattdm11: May 13 2007, 11:34 pm


User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
Alex
post May 14 2007, 3:42 pm
Post #2



FansOfLive Senior

*****

Reputation: 16 Rep Power: 16
Alex is off the scale  ()
Group: Members
Posts: 442
Joined: Feb 2006








QUOTE(mattdm11 @ May 14 2007, 4:13 pm) *

this has nothing to do with bashing the band, per se....but with the state of cd mastering. submitted for your listening pleasure - two +live+ songs - mirror song, from mental jewelry, and simple creed, from V. i have done nothing to the tracks, except "equalize" them using mp3gain.


I'm assuming you mean normalize? Or you're using 'equalize' as a term meaning 'matching perceived loudness', which it is not...


QUOTE(mattdm11 @ May 14 2007, 4:13 pm) *
mirror song was mastered at a decibel level of 92.4, and has minimal clipping (the effect of making the CD "louder", ruining the dynamic range in the process). simple creed was mastered at a staggering 99.9 dB. both have been reduced to a decibel level of 91.5 (technically, the way mp3gain works, mirror song is now 90.9 dB and simple creed is 90.8 - negligible difference). even though there is some clipping on mirror song, listen to how crisp everything sounds compared to the sludge that is simple creed. (as an FYI, simple creed is not even the "loudest" song on V - some tracks are over 100 dB.)


Are you getting these stats from 'mp3 gain?' For one thing, usually amplitude in terms of mastering is represented as a 'negative' number (eg -12), stating the average volume of the track below digital maximum. The stats you're giving don't mean as much (I'm not trying to offend you or anything by the way). Secondly, given the name mp3 gain, I'm assuming your source files are indeed mp3s. NOT a good method of comparing anything audio related. (If you didn't use mp3's, ignore that).

On to mastering... I don't much care for MJ's production anyway (not bad, but certainly not great). And for the most part, I agree with you. The loudness wars are getting worse and worse, and people are afraid to take a stand and master at a quieter volume for fear of not sounding as good to the average consumer, when they first put the disc in. And if it's not that, then it's record companies insisting the cd have that extra couple of dB. Bad time in music to be a mastering engineer...

BUT... recording engineers today mix differently to 10-15 years ago. That clip you posted isn't entirely accurate, because

a) He's compressing an already mastered source. Never sounds good.
b) The mix engineer from 1989 wouldn't have been compensating for the fact that the track would get pumped- different methods are used nowadays to ensure that some of the clarity and attack from the pre-mastered file remain when mastered.

(Plus, normalizing down a track like Simple Creed in a consumer program is probably not the best way to A/B recordings...)

All in all, up to SS, Live recordings were mastered quite nicely (even SS suffers a small amount..). TDTH had fairly good production overall, in terms of the sound... (but too much autotune and compression for my liking). However, the mastering was pushed to a very loud level, resulting in a lot of square waves, and the overall EQ of the album wasn't that nice either.

QUOTE(mattdm11 @ May 14 2007, 4:13 pm) *
its about time that fans start complaining about the way all these new cds are being mastered....hell, its driving me to vinyl its become so bad. its amazing that CDs recorded 15-20 years ago sound better than what comes out now....all for the sake of the loudness war.


It is sad, and I agree that it needs to stop. I'm confident that in a decade or so's time, cd's from the last few years will be re-mastered at a quieter level. (exactly the opposite of what's currently happening). But saying old CD's sound better, in the end is quite subjective, as there are a number of other contributing factors to the sound of a cd. There are a lot of producers today doing some amazing mixes, and not ALL cd's from today suffer being pushed to such high levels. In general, the best mastering job's (imo) were taking place during the early to mid- 90's. They were making the most of the digital medium, but still retaining dynamic range.

QUOTE(mattdm11 @ May 14 2007, 4:13 pm) *
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Gmex_4hreQ
i stumbled upon this a few months ago, and to be honest, it has somewhat ruined my music listening. its so noticeable now...EVERY new CD is like this. ever wonder why californication sounded so bad? almost every song is over 100 dB - i think one song reaches 102 dB.

im curious as to what you all think.


Californication sucks production wise overall anyway. You can't entirely blame the mastering.

I'm not sure if this will make much sense, as I've written really quickly so as not to be late for uni.

Best topic in a long time though

smile.gif


User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post



Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 users are reading this topic (1 guests and 0 anonymous users)
0 members:

 


Lo-Fi Version Current date & time: July 11th, 2026 - 10:03 pm