How an Alleged Con Man Tore Apart One of the Nineties’…. Options

[717raised]

Fascinating read

https://trib.al/XF6zMPI?fbclid=IwAR3MWaG-lK...V7wwD5GC_cWcnic

This post has been edited by 717raised: Feb 18 2023, 9:49 am

[Hoodstock]

Saw the article this morning, definately an interesting read for any Līve fan. Info about the reunion pay, Ed used to beat up Chad in school, Ed currently defends Hynes (based on Chad's email). It's possible all or none of it is true. Who knows?

This post has been edited by Hoodstock: Feb 18 2023, 12:29 pm

[Gruno]

Ed currently defends Hynes (based on Chad's email).

I must have missed that portion. I only saw where Ed had stated, "innocent until proven guilty", which carried no opinion with it.

[Hoodstock]

I must have missed that portion. I only saw where Ed had stated, "innocent until proven guilty", which carried no opinion with it.

I totally disagree.

[Gruno]

I totally disagree.

You can disagree all you'd like with a 200 yr. old legal principle, but it still remains that the statement expressed carried no opinion.

[Hoodstock]

You can disagree all you'd like with a 200 yr. old legal principle, but it still remains that the statement expressed carried no opinion.

He's not in court, he's saying that in his defense. If he thought Hynes was dirty he wouldn't make that comment. There's only one scenario whare he does. Pretty obvious - for some I guess.