Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> A question I couldn't answer!, Band's name change
ShadowStormEK
post Dec 16 2007, 12:55 pm
Post #1



FansOfLive Senior

*****

Reputation: 60 Rep Power: 60
ShadowStormEK is off the scale  ()
Group: Members
Posts: 357
Joined: Dec 2007








Someone asked me today why Eddie and the guys changed their name from Public Affection to LIVE.

And I was floored.

I don't know the answer to that question!

Anybody have any idea??


User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies(1 - 8)
SecretInsomnia
post Dec 16 2007, 1:35 pm
Post #2



Lakini

Group Icon

Reputation: 615 Rep Power: 615
SecretInsomnia is off the scale  ()
Group: Members
Posts: 2,478
Joined: Feb 2006








yeah

after they were about to go for a breakthrough, signed a major label, they needed a more commercial, better name than Public Affection (and before P A it was even First Aid or something nervous.gif ).

But they all came up with some names, but Ed told later he actually didn't want a name for the band at all. Just nameless. For commercial reasons that wasn't possible tongue.gif so he wanted "the most nameless bandname in the world". As most of those names were already chosen (for example The Who), it became just LIVE.


User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ShadowStormEK
post Dec 16 2007, 2:45 pm
Post #3



FansOfLive Senior

*****

Reputation: 60 Rep Power: 60
ShadowStormEK is off the scale  ()
Group: Members
Posts: 357
Joined: Dec 2007








Thanks for replying so quickly!

Now I can go back to them with confidence and tell them the story!!!

bounce.gif banana.gif kicking.gif guitar.gif


User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Hoodstock
post Dec 18 2007, 8:35 pm
Post #4



The Voice of Reason

Group Icon

Reputation: 2152 Rep Power: 2152
Hoodstock is off the scale  ()
Group: Members
Posts: 5,284
Joined: Aug 2006
From: Michigan








QUOTE(SecretInsomnia @ Dec 16 2007, 1:35 pm) *

yeah

after they were about to go for a breakthrough, signed a major label, they needed a more commercial, better name than Public Affection (and before P A it was even First Aid or something nervous.gif ).

But they all came up with some names, but Ed told later he actually didn't want a name for the band at all. Just nameless. For commercial reasons that wasn't possible tongue.gif so he wanted "the most nameless bandname in the world". As most of those names were already chosen (for example The Who), it became just LIVE.

Maybe he said that at a later time but that's not the original story! no.gif

Yes, they had to come up with a new name that was more commercial. They couldn't agree on a name so they all came up with names and put their ideas in a hat. They agreed that whatever was drawn out would be the name. "Live" was drawn out. They agreed it was a good idea because every time "Live" was said, seen on television, or the news it would be free advertising for the band.


User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SecretInsomnia
post Dec 20 2007, 6:17 am
Post #5



Lakini

Group Icon

Reputation: 615 Rep Power: 615
SecretInsomnia is off the scale  ()
Group: Members
Posts: 2,478
Joined: Feb 2006








QUOTE(Hoodstock @ Dec 18 2007, 8:35 pm) *

Maybe he said that at a later time but that's not the original story! no.gif

Yes, they had to come up with a new name that was more commercial. They couldn't agree on a name so they all came up with names and put their ideas in a hat. They agreed that whatever was drawn out would be the name. "Live" was drawn out. They agreed it was a good idea because every time "Live" was said, seen on television, or the news it would be free advertising for the band.


yeah I have heard your version of the story too different times, and I think it is true, but about being nameless, Ed told that also diff. times, also in a 2006 interview on Dutch television.


User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Hoodstock
post Dec 22 2007, 10:02 am
Post #6



The Voice of Reason

Group Icon

Reputation: 2152 Rep Power: 2152
Hoodstock is off the scale  ()
Group: Members
Posts: 5,284
Joined: Aug 2006
From: Michigan








QUOTE(SecretInsomnia @ Dec 20 2007, 6:17 am) *

yeah I have heard your version of the story too different times, and I think it is true, but about being nameless, Ed told that also diff. times, also in a 2006 interview on Dutch television.

I heard it directly from Chad Taylor and Pat on MTV back in the day when they were on MTV all the time.


User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Gertjan
post Dec 30 2007, 5:17 am
Post #7



FansOfLive Senior

*****

Reputation: 447 Rep Power: 447
Gertjan is off the scale  ()
Group: Members
Posts: 409
Joined: Feb 2006








From what I recall, they found "Public Affection" too immature and even a bit stupid for a band's name. They wanted a more universal name and picked "Live" from a hat with the suggestions.


User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Merica
post Dec 30 2007, 6:43 am
Post #8



Proverbial G.

Group Icon

Reputation: 1364.5 Rep Power: 1364.5
Merica is off the scale  ()
Group: Members
Posts: 3,003
Joined: Feb 2007








I wonder what other suggestions were in the hat.


User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ShadowStormEK
post Jan 21 2008, 2:20 am
Post #9



FansOfLive Senior

*****

Reputation: 60 Rep Power: 60
ShadowStormEK is off the scale  ()
Group: Members
Posts: 357
Joined: Dec 2007








QUOTE(Merica @ Dec 30 2007, 6:43 am) *

I wonder what other suggestions were in the hat.


The band pretty much answers that question in these interviews!

Live Past Present Future part 1

Live Past Present Future part 2

Live Past Present Future part 3





User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 users are reading this topic (1 guests and 0 anonymous users)
0 members:

 


Lo-Fi Version Current date & time: July 11th, 2026 - 2:15 pm