Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

18 Pages V « < 15 16 17 18 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> TGF rocks and..., I'm the fuck out of here!
SinfulEyes
post Jun 14 2010, 3:33 pm
Post #241



Lakini

Group Icon

Reputation: 777.5 Rep Power: 777.5
SinfulEyes is off the scale  ()
Group: Members
Posts: 2,607
Joined: Feb 2007
From: California








QUOTE(SJN1279 @ Jun 14 2010, 3:06 pm) *

Ed does post on Facebook when he has something to communicate and his posts are clearly marked. They brought me in to update on tour info, and stuff like that.

Ed posting at all, is better than him never using technology to be in contact with fans as was the case in previous years.


Ed this. Ed that. Get off him already.


User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SJN1279
post Jun 14 2010, 4:07 pm
Post #242



Lakini

Group Icon

Reputation: 1908.5 Rep Power: 1908.5
SJN1279 is off the scale  ()
Group: Members
Posts: 7,864
Joined: Feb 2006
From: NJ








QUOTE(SinfulEyes @ Jun 14 2010, 4:33 pm) *

Ed this. Ed that. Get off him already.


Has Jimmy called you at work recently?

cool.gif


User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
OutToDry
post Jun 14 2010, 4:20 pm
Post #243



Lakini

Group Icon

Reputation: 598.5 Rep Power: 598.5
OutToDry is off the scale  ()
Group: Members
Posts: 8,930
Joined: Oct 2009








Ed's a royal douchebag!!!


User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SinfulEyes
post Jun 14 2010, 4:38 pm
Post #244



Lakini

Group Icon

Reputation: 777.5 Rep Power: 777.5
SinfulEyes is off the scale  ()
Group: Members
Posts: 2,607
Joined: Feb 2007
From: California








QUOTE(SJN1279 @ Jun 14 2010, 4:07 pm) *

Has Jimmy called you at work recently?

cool.gif


no.gif


User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Existentialist
post Jun 14 2010, 5:40 pm
Post #245



Lakini

Group Icon

Reputation: 503.5 Rep Power: 503.5
Existentialist is off the scale  ()
Group: Members
Posts: 1,690
Joined: Mar 2007








QUOTE(SJN1279 @ Jun 14 2010, 1:26 pm) *

If you are begining a lawsuit, the worst possible thing to do is post details in a public blog beforehand. Chad had to clean up a lot of spilled milk, which is why all those posts were pulled from public view. Ed can easily counter their lawsuit by saying that Chad tried to hurt his earnings by posting negative things about him in an internet blog and Live's email.


In court all that matters is what can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. If Ed circumvented the other band members and signed his own deal which trumped an existing deal, it will be very obvious he is wrong and there will be a tangible amount of damages suffered. How much work he actually did makes no difference. He may have done 90% of the work and should therefore be entitled to 90% of the money, but if the initial contract wasn't set up that way, then that's his loss, not a reason to create a new contract behind the others' backs.

Ed can not easily counter their lawsuit by claiming damages from negative posts on the Internet. That case would be thrown out in 2 seconds. There is absolutely no way to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Ed lost X amount of dollars as a direct result of the negative posts. No way to prove it; case closed.


User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
crazy1
post Jun 14 2010, 5:58 pm
Post #246



Ghost

Group Icon

Reputation: 80 Rep Power: 80
crazy1 is off the scale  ()
Group: Members
Posts: 893
Joined: Jan 2007
From: Lake Como, NJ








QUOTE(SJN1279 @ Jun 14 2010, 1:26 pm) *

If you are begining a lawsuit, the worst possible thing to do is post details in a public blog beforehand. Chad had to clean up a lot of spilled milk, which is why all those posts were pulled from public view. Ed can easily counter their lawsuit by saying that Chad tried to hurt his earnings by posting negative things about him in an internet blog and Live's email.


ONLY if what he said is untrue. Which I don't think it is. It is up to Ed to prove what Chad said is untrue. I learned this in a law class.


User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SJN1279
post Jun 14 2010, 6:37 pm
Post #247



Lakini

Group Icon

Reputation: 1908.5 Rep Power: 1908.5
SJN1279 is off the scale  ()
Group: Members
Posts: 7,864
Joined: Feb 2006
From: NJ








QUOTE(Existentialist @ Jun 14 2010, 6:40 pm) *

In court all that matters is what can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. If Ed circumvented the other band members and signed his own deal which trumped an existing deal, it will be very obvious he is wrong and there will be a tangible amount of damages suffered. How much work he actually did makes no difference. He may have done 90% of the work and should therefore be entitled to 90% of the money, but if the initial contract wasn't set up that way, then that's his loss, not a reason to create a new contract behind the others' backs.

Ed can not easily counter their lawsuit by claiming damages from negative posts on the Internet. That case would be thrown out in 2 seconds. There is absolutely no way to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Ed lost X amount of dollars as a direct result of the negative posts. No way to prove it; case closed.


Most civil cases are settled anyway. A long drawn out trial will only cut the band members future earnings.


User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SJN1279
post Jun 14 2010, 6:40 pm
Post #248



Lakini

Group Icon

Reputation: 1908.5 Rep Power: 1908.5
SJN1279 is off the scale  ()
Group: Members
Posts: 7,864
Joined: Feb 2006
From: NJ










I also see nothing of a secret publishing contract in these court files. Did I miss something?


User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
OutToDry
post Jun 14 2010, 6:47 pm
Post #249



Lakini

Group Icon

Reputation: 598.5 Rep Power: 598.5
OutToDry is off the scale  ()
Group: Members
Posts: 8,930
Joined: Oct 2009








Nick read the entire brief...........grad school? Really??

QUOTE
Kowalczyk and Levin Engineer a Transaction on Behalf of
Black Coffee Without the Participation of Plaintiffs and
then Wrongfully Withhold Income from Plaintiff (sections 32-39)






User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SJN1279
post Jun 14 2010, 6:48 pm
Post #250



Lakini

Group Icon

Reputation: 1908.5 Rep Power: 1908.5
SJN1279 is off the scale  ()
Group: Members
Posts: 7,864
Joined: Feb 2006
From: NJ








QUOTE(OutToDry @ Jun 14 2010, 7:47 pm) *

Nick read the entire brief...........grad school? Really??


I'm smart, but lack the attention span for that. 3 sentences in a 10 page brief. smile.gif

But did that contract have anything to do with songs?


User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
OutToDry
post Jun 14 2010, 6:51 pm
Post #251



Lakini

Group Icon

Reputation: 598.5 Rep Power: 598.5
OutToDry is off the scale  ()
Group: Members
Posts: 8,930
Joined: Oct 2009








You lack the attention span to find the real answers/allegation of what we been spewing around since late last year? Spare me the comedy spoiled boy.


User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SJN1279
post Jun 14 2010, 6:56 pm
Post #252



Lakini

Group Icon

Reputation: 1908.5 Rep Power: 1908.5
SJN1279 is off the scale  ()
Group: Members
Posts: 7,864
Joined: Feb 2006
From: NJ








QUOTE(OutToDry @ Jun 14 2010, 7:51 pm) *

You lack the attention span to find the real answers/allegation of what we been spewing around since late last year? Spare me the comedy spoiled boy.


Wow, trying to get personal now, huh? Real answers are usually not contained in one half of a court document.

Curiously, what do you do for a living? What is your level of schooling. Not that it matters, but I'm curious.


User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SinfulEyes
post Jun 14 2010, 7:02 pm
Post #253



Lakini

Group Icon

Reputation: 777.5 Rep Power: 777.5
SinfulEyes is off the scale  ()
Group: Members
Posts: 2,607
Joined: Feb 2007
From: California








QUOTE(SJN1279 @ Jun 14 2010, 6:56 pm) *

Wow, trying to get personal now, huh? Real answers are usually not contained in one half of a court document.

Curiously, what do you do for a living? What is your level of schooling. Not that it matters, but I'm curious.


Nick, you are starting to take things too personally. We are going to start to have to call you Jimmy soon.


User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
OutToDry
post Jun 14 2010, 7:04 pm
Post #254



Lakini

Group Icon

Reputation: 598.5 Rep Power: 598.5
OutToDry is off the scale  ()
Group: Members
Posts: 8,930
Joined: Oct 2009








QUOTE(SJN1279 @ Jun 14 2010, 7:56 pm) *


Wow, trying to get personal now, huh? Real answers are usually not contained in one half of a court document.

Curiously, what do you do for a living? What is your level of schooling. Not that it matters, but I'm curious.




Not going to tell you.....I get personal with you because you act all high and mightly and don't see things with a clear eye.

I sweep streets and pick up horse manure.

This post has been edited by OutToDry: Jun 14 2010, 7:05 pm


User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SJN1279
post Jun 14 2010, 7:07 pm
Post #255



Lakini

Group Icon

Reputation: 1908.5 Rep Power: 1908.5
SJN1279 is off the scale  ()
Group: Members
Posts: 7,864
Joined: Feb 2006
From: NJ








QUOTE(OutToDry @ Jun 14 2010, 8:04 pm) *

Not going to tell you.....I get personal with you because you act all high and mightly and don't see things with a clear eye.

I sweep streets and pick up horse manure.


That's fine, a job is a job as far as I'm concerned. There is no reason to personally attack anyones education level or job(like you have been doing towards me).


User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

18 Pages V « < 15 16 17 18 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 users are reading this topic (2 guests and 0 anonymous users)
0 members:

 


Lo-Fi Version Current date & time: August 27th, 2026 - 7:14 am